The unfolding legal drama surrounding the decision of Malaysian Health Minister, Dr Zaliha Mustafa, to remove vape liquids from the Poisons List has sparked controversy on a national scale. Three civil society groups have initiated a lawsuit to contest this move, which they argue permits unregulated sale of vape products, including to minors, risking nicotine addiction.
Interestingly, this case presents an opportunity to look beyond the controversy and examine the implications of the decision from another angle. The story unfolds with a focus on public health versus revenue generation. But is it just a black-and-white narrative?
The removal of vape liquids from the Poisons List is viewed as a strategic move to impose taxes on nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and vape liquids. Critics argue this action prioritizes revenue over public health. But what if we were to examine the broader economic implications?
Also read: Deciding Election Dates: Key EC Gathering This Week Promises Exciting Outcomes
Taxing these products could significantly contribute to the state’s revenue. This additional funding could potentially be utilized to bolster the healthcare system and fund public health campaigns targeting smoking cessation and nicotine addiction education. Thus, it might not be a simple case of revenue over health but a calculated decision with a long-term health strategy in mind.
Nevertheless, there is a valid concern over the unrestricted sale of these vape products to minors. Previous regulations allowed sales of vape products to children only for medical purposes. The critics argue for more stringent regulation, which the government should undoubtedly consider for the welfare of the young population.
